gabe-assess

Assess proposed changes for blast radius, maturity scope, and prerequisites.

Updated Feb 19, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/Brownbull/gabe-suite --skill gabe-assess
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: gabe-assess
Source: https://github.com/Brownbull/gabe-suite/tree/main/skills/gabe-assess
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/Brownbull/gabe-suite --skill gabe-assess

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

The assessment helps teams surface blast radius, maturity scope, prerequisites, and alternatives before committing to a change, reducing surprises and rework.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Blast-radius and scope analysis across touched files and shared infrastructure
  • Prerequisites and dependencies verification before changes
  • Structured decision guidance with recommended actions and trade-offs

Quick Start

Describe the proposed change and context, then generate a structured assessment of blast radius, maturity scope, prerequisites, and alternatives.

Frequently Asked Questions about gabe-assess

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
What is blast radius analysis and when do I need it for a change decision?

Blast radius analysis identifies the potential impact of a proposed change across modules, dependencies, and shared infrastructure. You need it during planning or mid-task detours to surface hidden risks and reduce rework before committing.

How do I assess prerequisites and dependencies before committing to a change?

You assess prerequisites by describing your proposed change and context to generate a structured evaluation. This verifies dependencies and shared infrastructure requirements before you proceed, providing a recommended action and trade-offs.

Does this assessment tool work for mid-task detours or only for initial planning?

The assessment works for both mid-task detours and initial planning decisions. It evaluates proposed changes by surfacing maturity scope, blast radius, and prerequisites whenever you need structured decision guidance during your workflow.

What's the best way to evaluate alternatives and trade-offs for a proposed change?

The best way to evaluate alternatives is to generate a structured assessment that compares blast radius and maturity scope. This provides recommended actions and highlights trade-offs across affected modules and shared infrastructure.

How to surface hidden impact and maturity scope before modifying shared infrastructure?

To surface hidden impact, describe the proposed change to generate an assessment of blast radius and maturity scope. This structured evaluation identifies affected files, shared infrastructure, and prerequisites before you commit.

When should I not use an automated blast radius assessment for a change?

You should not use an automated blast radius assessment for trivial, isolated changes with no shared infrastructure or cross-module dependencies. It is designed for complex changes where hidden impact, prerequisites, and alternatives need structured evaluation.