skills.rest
gaiastudio-ai
gaiastudio-aiOFFICIAL
Explore all skills by this author →
GitHub

gaia-adversarial

Identify flaws, gaps, and risks in documents, designs, or code.

2|Updated Apr 15, 2026
Search Tags:#security#analysis#review#report#adversarial#risk#findings
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/gaiastudio-ai/gaia-public --skill gaia-adversarial
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent▼
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: gaia-adversarial
Source: https://github.com/gaiastudio-ai/gaia-public/tree/main/plugins/gaia/skills/gaia-adversarial
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/gaiastudio-ai/gaia-public --skill gaia-adversarial

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

This skill enables a cynical, attitude-driven adversarial review of any target (document, design, or code) to surface hidden flaws, gaps, and risks that traditional reviews may miss, empowering teams to see weaknesses early.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Ranked Findings: outputs a prioritized list of issues with explicit severity and confidence.
  • Multi-dimensional Analysis: evaluates feasibility, completeness, assumptions, contradictions, security, scale, user impact, and business risk.
  • Deterministic Reporting: produces a formal adversarial review artifact suitable for stakeholder review.

Quick Start

Provide a target artifact (document, design, or code path) to generate a comprehensive adversarial review.

Frequently Asked Questions about gaia-adversarial

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
What is an adversarial review and how does it identify risks in design documents?▼

An adversarial review applies a cynical, attitude-driven analysis to any target artifact to expose hidden flaws, gaps, and risks across technical, business, security, and user perspectives, surfacing contradictions traditional reviews miss.

How do I generate a ranked security findings report for my code?▼

Provide a target code path or document to generate a deterministic findings artifact containing prioritized issues, with explicit severity and confidence rankings written to a date-based filename in the planning artifacts location.

Can I use this adversarial analysis for non-technical business documents?▼

Yes, the multi-dimensional analysis evaluates feasibility, completeness, assumptions, user impact, and business risk, making it suitable for reviewing business documents and designs alongside technical code artifacts.

Does the adversarial review report include suggested fixes for the identified flaws?▼

No, the review deliberately does not suggest fixes; instead, it delivers a deterministic findings artifact listing each issue with its severity and confidence to empower teams to address weaknesses independently.

What is the best way to evaluate failure modes and contradictions in a technical design?▼

The best way to evaluate failure modes is through a multi-dimensional adversarial review that assesses scale, security, and user impact to surface contradictions, producing a formal ranked findings report for stakeholder review.

Related Skills

Explore More Software Engineering Skills→
anderson-0anderson-0
4

adversarial-review

Identifies weaknesses and risks in submitted artifacts via structured adversarial review.

Community
Intermediate
hotaqhotaq

code-review

Review code changes for security, quality, performance, and maintainability issues.

Community
Advanced
icartshicartsh
4

code-analyze

Analyze .NET solutions for code quality, security, and dependency issues.

Community
Advanced
fdshg693fdshg693

copilot-test-skill

Validate Copilot integration with a minimal YAML frontmatter Skill unit.

Community
Basic