What problem does it solve?
Teams iterating on GAIA benchmark agents lack a clear view of how their harness compares to reference implementations, making it hard to prioritize which architectural change yields the highest pass-rate improvement.
Core Features & Use Cases
- Side-by-side architecture comparison: Maps ruflo's harness components (gaia-loader, gaia-agent, gaia-tools, voting, hardness routing, judge) against the Princeton HAL reference across dimensions like question count, web search, code execution, and file handling.
- Gap analysis with impact ranking: Identifies primary gaps (real python_exec sandbox, full 165-question L1 set, Playwright-based browsing) and secondary gaps (file parsing, turn budget, system prompt tuning).
- Prioritized improvement roadmap: Provides a P0-P3 table with expected pass-rate lift and effort estimates for each change.
- Use Case: Before planning the next GAIA iteration, run this comparison to confirm that implementing a real code execution sandbox (E2B) is the highest-ROI change, then store findings in AgentDB memory for future runs.
Quick Start
Ask the agent to compare the ruflo GAIA harness against the HAL reference implementation and list the highest-impact capability gaps with an improvement roadmap.