game-design-framework

Evaluate game mechanics using a 5-Component Relevance Filter that checks clarity, motivation, response, satisfaction, and fit. This structured methodology replaces intuition-based design decisions with evidence-based analysis to determine mechanic coherence.

Balance game mechanics using a standardized Numbers Policy that ensures every tuning value has a defined source, target, and confidence level. This tiered approach establishes rigorous numerical balance across combat systems and player interactions.

Document player state machines using a standardized checklist that specifies every state from startup to recovery. This ensures all player actions are fully defined, preventing floaty or unresponsive combat feel during playtesting.

Combat mechanics feel off when state machine documentation is incomplete, missing transitions from startup to recovery. Analyze playtest feedback against the 5-Component Relevance Filter to identify gaps in clarity, response, or satisfaction.

Justify balance changes by applying the Numbers Policy framework, which assigns a source, target, and confidence level to every tuning value. This evidence-based approach replaces intuition with structured methodology for design documentation.

You need a structured game design framework when replacing intuition-based balancing with rigorous methodology for mechanics and systems. Apply it during combat tuning, playtest analysis, and game design documentation to ensure balance and coherence.