gap-analysis

To automate gap analysis between specifications and implementation, you can use a route-aware tool that compares your codebase against defined specs. It distinguishes between new app development and existing app management to produce detailed gap reports and implementation roadmaps.

AST-powered analysis identifies gaps in existing applications by parsing the codebase structure and comparing it directly against your specifications. This brownfield route detects discrepancies between the actual code and the required spec-driven implementation.

The greenfield route validates spec completeness and determines target tech stacks for new applications, while the brownfield route uses AST-powered analysis to identify implementation gaps in existing codebases against current specifications.

Yes, you can generate an implementation roadmap from identified codebase gaps. The analysis automatically creates an implementation roadmap based on the discovered discrepancies between specifications and implementation, prioritized for your development workflow.

Yes, gap analysis integrates with specification-checking dependencies to support spec-driven development. It leverages these checks to validate greenfield specs and compare brownfield codebases against your defined requirements.

You should use automated gap analysis for a new application when you need to validate spec completeness and determine your target tech stacks. The greenfield route ensures your specifications are fully ready before implementation begins.