gap-enforcing-decisions

Readiness gates and decision enforcement are automated by applying 10 decision rules to gap data, producing state changes, execution queues, and governor escalations. You need the latest gap ledger and destruction log to run the workflow.

Decision enforcement in governance workflows applies priority, evidence promotion, and kill rules to gap data. It ensures consistent state changes, validates architecture, resolves contradictions, and generates auditable readiness gates and execution queues.

Contradiction resolution and architecture validation are handled by enforcing decision rules across gap computation outputs. The workflow checks current hypothesis states, destruction logs, and gap ledgers to prevent contaminated tests and ensure accurate state changes.

Yes, a gap-computing-ledger is required. You must provide gap ledger outputs, destruction logs, current hypothesis states, decision deadlines, blockers, and any governor responses to compute execution queues and readiness gate results.

Workflow automation handles governor escalations and kill conditions by applying decision rules to gap data. It evaluates top-gap prioritization, evidence promotion, and deadlines to generate escalations and prevent contaminated test execution automatically.

Automated decision enforcement should not be used when gap computation and destruction are incomplete. The workflow requires fully populated gap ledgers, destruction logs, and current hypothesis states to accurately produce readiness gates and execution queues.