git-commit

Analyze diffs and stage changes to generate conventional git commits.

Updated Aug 27, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/PoyoPoak/FastAPI-App-Template --skill git-commit-poyopoak
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: git-commit
Source: https://github.com/PoyoPoak/FastAPI-App-Template/tree/main/.agents/skills/git-commit
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/PoyoPoak/FastAPI-App-Template --skill git-commit-poyopoak

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

Automatically generate conventional commits by analyzing diffs, staging changes, and crafting clear messages, reducing manual effort and improving traceability.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Auto-infer type and scope from changes
  • Generate conventional commit messages from diffs
  • Interactive commit with optional type/scope/description overrides
  • Intelligent staging to ensure logical, cohesive commits

Quick Start

Analyze the current changes and generate a conventional commit message.

Frequently Asked Questions about git-commit

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I generate conventional commit messages automatically from git diffs?

Generating conventional commit messages from git diffs is automated by analyzing your changes to infer the type and scope, then crafting a formatted message to reduce manual effort and improve traceability.

What is the best way to stage logical changes before making a conventional commit?

Staging logical changes before a conventional commit is handled by intelligent staging, which analyzes your diffs to ensure only cohesive, well-structured modifications are grouped together into a single commit.

Can I override the inferred type and scope for a git commit?

Overriding the inferred type and scope for a git commit is supported through an interactive process, allowing you to manually adjust the type, scope, and description before finalizing the commit.

Does this automated commit tool work for large software projects during release preparation?

This automated commit tool works for large software projects during daily development, code review, and release preparation, applying type and scope inference to maintain logical and well-structured commits at scale.

Why should I use conventional commits instead of plain git commit messages?

Conventional commits provide structured traceability by formatting messages with inferred types and scopes, making it easier to track changes during code review and automate release preparation compared to plain git commit messages.