git-flow

Git branching strategies like GitFlow, GitHub Flow, and Trunk-Based Development are selected based on deployment frequency and team size. GitFlow suits structured releases, GitHub Flow fits simple continuous deployment, and Trunk-Based Development optimizes frequent merges.

Git branch naming conventions use prefixes like feature, fix, hotfix, refactor, and release to categorize changes. This maintains a clean version control history and clarifies branch purpose for the entire team.

Merging a feature branch back into the main development branch involves selecting a merge method like standard merge commits, squash merges, or rebase workflows. Following best practices ensures a clean project history without confusing intermediate commits.

Use a rebase workflow instead of standard merge commits to maintain a linear project history. This approach avoids intermediate merge commits, while squash merges condense multiple feature commits into a single clean entry.

Git workflow guidance includes detailed instructions for resolving merge conflicts during branching and merging operations. It provides best practices for handling conflicts across merge commits, squash merges, and rebase workflows.