git-helpers

Generate conventional commits, review code with confidence scores, and create PRs via gh CLI.

8|Updated Feb 9, 2026

Search Tags:#automation #git #commit #review #pull-request #conventional-commits #gh-cli

Ready to run

npx skills add https://github.com/adeonir/agent-skills --skill git-helpers

💬 Prompt for ChatGPT / Claude Chat▼

Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: git-helpers
Source: https://github.com/adeonir/agent-skills/tree/main/skills/%28tooling%29/git-helpers
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/adeonir/agent-skills --skill git-helpers

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

💡 This Skill includes references (resource) components.

What problem does it solve?

Git workflows can be error-prone and verbose; git-helpers standardizes conventional commits, code reviews with confidence scoring, and streamlined PR creation, reducing manual steps and cognitive load.

Core Features & Use Cases

Conventional commits: Generate well-formed commit messages from diffs.
Automated reviews: Perform code review with confidence scoring and guideline checks.
PR descriptions & push: Create concise PR summaries and push PRs via gh CLI.
Use Case: A developer wants to cleanly commit a feature, have automated review, and auto-create a PR for quick integration.

Quick Start

Start by committing changes using the conventional-commit format, then run the review, summarize, and push PR.

Frequently Asked Questions about git-helpers

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema

How do I generate conventional commits from git diffs automatically?▼

Automated conventional commit generation works by analyzing your staged git diffs to produce well-formed, deterministic commit messages. This reduces manual formatting effort and standardizes commit history across feature, bugfix, and docs changes.

Can I automate code reviews and PR creation using the gh CLI?▼

Yes, automated code reviews and PR creation are integrated directly with the gh CLI. The workflow performs confidence-scored reviews and guideline audits, then generates PR descriptions and pushes the PR seamlessly.

What is confidence-scored code review in a git workflow?▼

Confidence-scored code review evaluates diffs against guidelines and assigns a reliability score to the assessment. This mechanism helps developers gauge code quality deterministically before integrating changes into the base branch.

Do I need to manually specify the base branch for automated pull requests?▼

No, base-branch auto-detection is built into the pull request workflow. The system automatically identifies the correct base branch, streamlining PR creation without requiring manual branch input.

What is the best way to streamline feature branch commits and PRs?▼

The best way to streamline feature branch commits and PRs is using a unified workflow that generates conventional commits, runs automated reviews, and pushes ready PRs via gh CLI. This reduces manual steps and cognitive load.

Are there limitations to automated git commit and review workflows?▼

Automated git commit and review workflows require gh CLI integration for PR actions and rely on diff quality for accurate conventional commit generation. Complex logic changes may yield lower confidence scores during guideline audits.