Git Workflow Guide

Trunk-Based Development is often recommended for large teams needing frequent releases, while Git Flow suits scheduled release cycles. This guide provides decision criteria to evaluate team size and release cadence to select the optimal Git workflow.

Choosing between merge and rebase depends on your team's collaboration style and need for linear history. This guide offers a decision framework comparing merge, rebase, and squash strategies tailored to different team sizes and release cadences.

To set up GitHub Flow, you create short-lived branches off the main branch and merge via pull requests. This guide provides operational playbooks with step-by-step commands for daily workflows, branch naming, and continuous deployment integration.

Yes, Trunk-Based Development works effectively for solo developers by committing directly to the main branch with minimal overhead. This guide covers workflow implementations scaled from solo developers to large collaborative teams.

Handling hotfixes requires a defined process to patch production quickly without disrupting ongoing development. This guide includes an operational playbook detailing step-by-step hotfix processes, conflict resolution, and branch management.

Standardized branch naming conventions are needed to organize code changes and clarify the purpose of each branch. This guide provides actionable conventions and onboarding checklists to standardize Git practices across your team.