git-workflow

Git branching strategy depends on team size and release frequency, choosing between GitHub Flow, trunk-based development, and GitFlow. Evaluate your release cadence to select the model that balances stability and deployment speed.

Conventional commits and pull request formatting require structured prefixes and clear descriptions. Apply conventional commit formatting rules to standardize history, and use review checklists to ensure PR titles and descriptions meet team standards.

Merge versus rebase selection depends on whether you need to preserve contextual history or maintain a linear project timeline. Choose rebase to linearize feature branches before integration, and merge to visualize parallel development history.

Resolve merge conflicts safely by identifying conflicting file sections and manually integrating changes without deleting teammate code. Use Git workflow guidance to recover from mistakes and ensure conflict resolution aligns with team conventions.

Git release management uses version tags to mark milestones and hook-based quality checks to enforce standards. Configure pre-commit and pre-push hooks to automatically validate commit messages and run tests before integration.