git-workflow

Standardized Git workflow enforcement requires defining branch naming conventions, conventional commit types, and a staging branch for integration. This approach uses feature, fix, and chore branches with PR-driven reviews to keep collaboration predictable and auditable.

The best way to name Git branches for features and fixes uses standardized prefixes: feature/<name>, fix/<name>, and chore/<name>. This naming strategy maintains a clean history and clarifies the purpose of each branch during parallel development.

Manage staging and main branches by targeting all pull requests to the staging integration branch and treating main as production. Controlled deployment requires a final merge to main by a designated authority to ensure a governed path to production.

Conventional commits cause merge issues when atomic commit boundaries are not respected during parallel work. Resolving this requires guided conflict resolution, rebasing, and cherry-picking to maintain a clean history while preserving conventional commit types.

Yes, this Git workflow supports parallel feature development without losing history by using staging as the integration hub. It provides guidance for rebasing and cherry-picking to resolve conflicts and maintain a clean, auditable commit history.