git-workflow

To resolve a Git merge conflict, identify the conflicting files, manually edit the marked sections to keep the desired code, stage the resolved files, and commit to complete the merge. Step-by-step guidance ensures accurate conflict resolution.

Gitflow branching strategy separates feature development, release preparation, and hotfixes into dedicated branches. Implement this model by creating feature branches off a develop branch, then merging back via structured pull requests for organized version control.

Create a new Git branch for user authentication by running the command to switch to a new branch named 'feature/user-authentication'. This isolates development, maintains a clean main branch, and prepares the code for structured commits.

A code review checklist before merging a pull request should verify code quality, test coverage, and commit message clarity. This ensures the new code meets project standards and integrates smoothly without breaking existing repository functionality.

Standard Git version control requires no special environment setup beyond having Git installed. It operates independently to manage commits, branches, and merges, supporting collaborative development workflows directly within your repository.

Yes, you can use Git commands for both local commits and collaborative code reviews. Stage changes locally with standard commands, push to a remote repository, and use the PR review checklist to ensure code quality before final merging.