github-code-review

Reviewing GitHub pull requests for security risks and defects involves analyzing source code diffs, inspecting changed files, and checking for correctness, maintainability, and missing tests before integration. This Skill applies consistent checks across code changes to identify bugs, SQL injection risks, and quality problems.

Checking local git diffs for bugs before pushing a branch requires analyzing local changes and inspecting changed files for common correctness, security, and maintainability issues. This Skill provides a structured workflow to review local changes and summarize critical issues, warnings, and suggestions.

Automating code review for GitHub workflows involves inspecting pull request metadata, diffs, and changed files, then submitting comments or formal review decisions via gh or REST APIs. This Skill applies consistent review standards for correctness, security, testing, performance, and documentation quality across code changes.

Submitting formal review decisions and inline comments on GitHub PRs is supported through optional gh or GitHub REST API interactions for pull request management. This Skill enables reviewing PR metadata and diffs, then submitting actionable feedback or formal review decisions directly to the repository.

This code review process requires git-based change analysis for local diffs and pull request inspection. Optional gh or GitHub REST API interactions are needed for pull request management, such as submitting formal review decisions and inline comments, but no specific external dependencies are mandated.

Code review can identify maintainability issues in source code changes by applying consistent checks for correctness, security, testing, performance, and documentation quality. This Skill helps developers find potential SQL injection risks, missing tests, and other quality problems before code is merged.