github-evidence-triage

Triage GitHub issues and pull requests with evidence-linked findings.

2|Updated May 3, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/Rosetears520/aili-workflows --skill github-evidence-triage
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: github-evidence-triage
Source: https://github.com/Rosetears520/aili-workflows/tree/main/skills/github-evidence-triage
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/Rosetears520/aili-workflows --skill github-evidence-triage

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

This Skill helps you triage GitHub issues and pull requests by turning scattered discussion into a structured, source-grounded assessment with clear evidence links.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Read-only triage: Produce a report without commenting, labeling, reviewing, merging, or calling write actions on GitHub.
  • Evidence-backed findings: Separate reporter claims, maintainer statements, observed facts, inferred risks, and unverified items, with a stable evidence rule (URLs, SHAs, file:line, or fresh read outputs).
  • Issue/PR linkage: Connect an issue or PR to relevant repository code, tests, docs, commits, and changed files when needed for the analysis.
  • Structured output contract: Emit a consistent triage report with STATUS, EVIDENCE, FINDINGS, RISK / IMPACT, RECOMMENDED NEXT STEP, and UNVERIFIED sections.

Quick Start

Use the github-evidence-triage skill to triage this GitHub pull request URL: <paste PR URL>.

Frequently Asked Questions about github-evidence-triage

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I triage a GitHub pull request with evidence links before reviewing?

To triage a GitHub pull request with evidence links, you provide the PR URL to generate a structured report mapping the issue to code, tests, docs, and git history. It separates reporter claims, maintainer statements, and inferred risks using stable references like URLs, commit SHAs, and file line ranges.

What is the best way to assess PR risk without modifying the repository?

Assessing PR risk without modifying the repository requires a strict read-only analysis that prohibits commenting, labeling, reviewing, or merging. This approach evaluates debugging reproducibility and maps changed files to repository artifacts while mandating every factual claim be supported by stable evidence references.

Does read-only GitHub issue triage support linking issues to repository commits and tests?

Read-only GitHub issue triage supports linking issues and PRs to relevant repository artifacts including code, tests, docs, and git history. It connects the issue to changed files and commits when needed for the analysis, ensuring all findings are backed by stable references such as URLs or commit SHAs.

Can I use issue triage to summarize debugging reproducibility for a specific GitHub issue?

You can use issue triage to summarize debugging reproducibility by evaluating the GitHub issue discussion and mapping it to repository artifacts. The triage applies a structured output contract with STATUS, EVIDENCE, FINDINGS, RISK / IMPACT, and UNVERIFIED sections to clarify reproducibility status.

What evidence format is required when mapping an issue to repository artifacts?

Mapping an issue to repository artifacts requires every factual claim to be supported by stable evidence references such as URLs, commit SHAs, file line ranges, or fresh read outputs. This strict evidence rule separates verified facts from inferred risks and unverified items in the final triage report.

When should I not use an automated GitHub issue triage report?

You should not use automated GitHub issue triage when you need to execute write actions like commenting, labeling, reviewing, or merging on the GitHub repository. This approach is strictly read-only and focuses solely on producing a source-grounded assessment without modifying the issue or pull request state.