github-review-pr

Reviews a GitHub pull request via a dispatched agent and writes a severity-labeled report.

2|Updated Apr 4, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/DoctorMozg/claude-pipelines --skill github-review-pr-doctormozg
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: github-review-pr
Source: https://github.com/DoctorMozg/claude-pipelines/tree/main/plugins/mz-dev-git/skills/github-review-pr
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/DoctorMozg/claude-pipelines --skill github-review-pr-doctormozg

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

💡 This Skill includes references (resource) components.

What problem does it solve? Reviewing GitHub pull requests thoroughly requires checking diffs, CI results, and multiple code lenses, which is slow and error-prone when done manually. This Skill automates the entire review by dispatching a specialized agent that produces a structured report with severity-labeled findings and a verdict. ## Core Features & Use Cases - Agent-Dispatched PR Review: Launches the github-pr-reviewer agent in an isolated worktree to analyze the PR with multi-lens fan-out and CI cross-referencing. - Structured Reports: Writes findings to .mz/reviews/ with Critical/severity labels and a VERDICT line for quick decision-making. - Robust Escalation: Validates PR accessibility via gh, MCP GitHub tools, or the REST API, and escalates ambiguous or blocked cases instead of guessing. - Use Case: Given a PR URL like https://github.com/owner/repo/pull/123, run the review and receive a report path plus the count of Critical findings before merging. ## Quick Start Ask the assistant to review the pull request at https://github.com/owner/repo/pull/123 and show the verdict and critical findings.

Frequently Asked Questions about github-review-pr

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I review a GitHub pull request with an AI agent?

Provide a PR URL or owner/repo#number reference and the skill dispatches the github-pr-reviewer agent in an isolated worktree. It returns a report under .mz/reviews/ with severity-labeled findings and a verdict line.

What PR reference formats are accepted for review?

Two formats are accepted: a full URL like https://github.com/owner/repo/pull/123, or the short form owner/repo#123. If the argument is missing or malformed, the skill asks for clarification rather than guessing.

What happens if the gh CLI is not available during PR review?

The skill falls back to MCP GitHub tools if exposed, then to the GitHub REST API via curl with a GITHUB_TOKEN. It only escalates to the user after all three access tiers fail.

When should I use review-branch instead of reviewing a GitHub PR?

Use review-branch when the changes live on a local branch rather than a GitHub pull request. For triaging many PRs at once, use github-scan-prs instead of reviewing them individually.

What does the PR review report contain?

The report is written to .mz/reviews/ with a dated filename and contains severity-labeled findings plus a VERDICT line. The skill prints the report path, the verdict, and the count of Critical findings.