Global Truth Safety

Enforce data-backed, verifiable assertions in code delivery and status reports.

Updated Aug 23, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/grimmolf/mga-soap-calculator --skill global-truth-safety
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: Global Truth Safety
Source: https://github.com/grimmolf/mga-soap-calculator/tree/main/.claude/skills/global-truth-safety
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/grimmolf/mga-soap-calculator --skill global-truth-safety

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

This Skill prevents unverified claims, hidden issues, and inaccurate reporting in development, fostering a culture of radical candor and data-backed decisions. It ensures that all assertions about code behavior, system status, and risks are factual and verifiable.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Verified Code Delivery: Ensures all delivered code is tested, running, and validated.
  • Immediate Problem Flagging: Encourages surfacing blockers, regressions, and risks upon discovery.
  • Data-Backed Assertions: Promotes linking technical claims to logs, test output, or benchmarks.
  • Use Case: When delivering a new feature, use this skill to ensure all claims about its behavior are backed by test results and observed system logs, preventing future bugs and rework.

Quick Start

Apply the Global Truth Safety skill to review the latest code commit and identify any unverified claims or potential risks.

Frequently Asked Questions about Global Truth Safety

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I ensure code claims are backed by test results and logs?

Verify all assertions about code behavior by linking them to test output, logs, or benchmarks. Document which tests validate each claim and reference specific log entries or metrics that confirm the code works as stated, preventing unverified assumptions from reaching production.

What's the best way to surface blockers and risks immediately in development?

Flag issues the moment you discover them rather than deferring or hiding them. Document the blocker with concrete evidence—error messages, test failures, or system logs—so the team can address it promptly and prevent cascading failures.

How do I prevent unverified claims in code delivery and status reports?

Report only facts you can validate: tested features, observed system behavior, and documented gaps. Cite logs, test results, and specifications rather than assumptions, creating an auditable trail of what actually works versus what remains untested or at risk.

Can I use this approach to validate new feature rollouts?

Yes. Before shipping a feature, confirm all behavior claims with passing tests and observed system logs. Challenge any assumption lacking evidence, document test coverage, and flag gaps so stakeholders know exactly what has been verified and what remains uncertain.

Why does factual accuracy matter in software development?

Unverified claims hide bugs, waste rework, and erode trust. Data-backed reporting catches regressions early, lets teams make informed decisions, and builds a culture where status updates and code assertions are trustworthy because they rest on logs, benchmarks, and test evidence.