gmira-proof

Audit web credibility surfaces and replace placeholder claims with verifiable evidence.

Updated Jul 25, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/OthmanAdi/gmira --skill gmira-proof
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: gmira-proof
Source: https://github.com/OthmanAdi/gmira/tree/main/skills/gmira-proof
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/OthmanAdi/gmira --skill gmira-proof

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

💡 This Skill includes references (resource) components.

What problem does it solve?

This skill solves the problem of generic, unconvincing, and potentially deceptive credibility surfaces (like fake logo walls or auto-rotating testimonials) that undermine user trust and professional integrity.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Doctrine Enforcement: Implements G7 standards to ensure all proof elements are real, verifiable, and honest.
  • Content Substitution: Provides a structured ladder of evidence, replacing placeholders with verifiable artifacts like methods, processes, and real student repositories.
  • Use Case: When building a landing page for a new service, use this skill to replace a generic, fake testimonial carousel with a specific, dated, and linked review that includes a falsifiable claim.

Quick Start

Apply the gmira-proof skill to audit the current credibility section and replace all placeholder content with verifiable evidence from the project documentation.

Frequently Asked Questions about gmira-proof

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I audit web design credibility surfaces to replace fake testimonials with verifiable evidence?

To audit web design credibility, apply a strict doctrine to replace placeholder content like fake testimonials with verifiable artifacts, such as dated, linked reviews containing falsifiable claims. This enforces truth in professional web projects.

What is the best way to enforce truth and credibility in web design outcome statistics?

Enforcing credibility in web design outcome statistics requires replacing invented metrics with real-world evidence based on a specific falsifiable attribution model. This ensures all displayed outcome statistics are honest and verifiable.

Why do generic logo walls undermine user trust on professional landing pages?

Generic logo walls undermine user trust because they present unconvincing, potentially deceptive proof elements. Replacing them with a structured ladder of evidence, such as real student repositories, restores professional integrity.

Can I use a structured evidence ladder to substitute placeholder content in web surfaces?

Yes, you can substitute placeholder content in web surfaces by applying a structured ladder of evidence. This replaces auto-rotating testimonials and fake metrics with specific methods, processes, and verifiable project documentation.

Does enforcing G7 doctrine require verifiable attribution models for all web design claims?

Yes, enforcing G7 doctrine requires the use of specific, falsifiable attribution models for all claims. This ensures that testimonials, logo walls, and outcome statistics in web design remain strictly verifiable and honest.

What should I avoid when building credibility sections for conversion-focused web surfaces?

When building credibility sections, avoid generic auto-rotating testimonial carousels and invented metrics. Replace these deceptive placeholders with verifiable evidence, such as specific, dated, and linked reviews to maintain user trust.