go-error-handling

Analyze and implement Go error handling patterns with wrapping and sentinel errors.

Updated Feb 28, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/phant-app/phant --skill go-error-handling-phant-app
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: go-error-handling
Source: https://github.com/phant-app/phant/tree/main/.agents/skills/go-error-handling
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/phant-app/phant --skill go-error-handling-phant-app

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

💡 This Skill includes references (resource) components.

What problem does it solve?

Go projects often suffer from inconsistent and error-prone handling, wrapping, and propagation of errors, leading to brittle code and difficult debugging.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Guidance on returning, wrapping, and handling errors in Go code to improve reliability.
  • Coverage of error strings, sentinel errors, and structured error types for safer API design.
  • Practices aligned with Google's and Uber's Go style guides, with concrete examples for real-world code.

Quick Start

Refactor your Go code to return errors, wrap with %w for chain preservation, and introduce sentinel or structured errors where needed.

Frequently Asked Questions about go-error-handling

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I wrap errors in Go to preserve the error chain?

To wrap errors in Go, use the %w verb with fmt.Errorf to preserve the original error chain for unwrapping and matching. This maintains error context while allowing callers to identify root causes using errors.Is and errors.As.

When should I use sentinel errors vs structured error types in Go?

Use sentinel errors for known expected conditions and structured error types when you need to attach contextual data. Sentinel errors support equality checks via errors.Is, while structured types enable type assertions with errors.As for safer API design.

What is the canonical way to handle Go error propagation?

The canonical way to handle Go error propagation is to return errors explicitly rather than panicking, wrapping them with context as they ascend the call stack. This approach aligns with Google's and Uber's Go style guides for reliable code.

How do I refactor Go code to improve error handling reliability?

Refactor Go code to improve error handling by returning errors consistently, wrapping with %w for chain preservation, and introducing sentinel or structured errors where needed. This reduces brittle code and simplifies debugging.

Does this Go error handling guidance support real-world codebases?

Yes, this guidance supports real-world Go codebases by providing concrete examples for error creation, wrapping, matching, and structured errors. It satisfies functional requirements for robust error propagation in production environments.

Why does my Go error handling produce brittle code?

Go error handling produces brittle code when errors are inconsistently wrapped, improperly propagated, or lack structured context. Applying canonical patterns for error strings and chains resolves these issues and improves debugging.