Guide manual Go code reviews across correctness, security, performance, and idioms.
npx skills add https://github.com/y-miyazaki/arc --skill go-review-y-miyazaki
Please help me install this Agent Skill. Skill: go-review Source: https://github.com/y-miyazaki/arc/tree/main/.github/skills/go-review Command: npx skills add https://github.com/y-miyazaki/arc --skill go-review-y-miyazaki
Go projects often suffer from inconsistent code reviews, leading to missed issues and slower delivery. This skill provides a structured Go code-review guide focused on correctness, security, performance, and idiomatic practices to help reviewers apply consistent, thorough evaluations.
Use the go-review skill to guide a manual PR review for a Go codebase and generate structured feedback.
High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.
Reviewing Go code for security, performance, and idiomatic best practices requires a structured guide that surfaces high-impact issues and promotes consistent team-wide evaluation across pull requests and CI checks. This skill provides that structured manual review process.
A thorough Go code review should evaluate correctness, error handling, concurrency patterns, security vulnerabilities, performance implications, testability, naming conventions, formatting, and documentation to ensure high-quality architectural and design decisions.
Yes, you can integrate this structured Go review process into your existing CI checks and team-wide review workflows to support human judgment scenarios and capture actionable feedback during pull requests and code audits.
No, this Go review approach complements automated linting by focusing on human judgment, emphasizing design decisions, and evaluating architectural patterns that require expert assessment rather than solely running automated checks.
The best way to enforce consistent Go code reviews is applying a structured guide focused on correctness, security, performance, and Go idioms to help reviewers apply consistent, thorough evaluations during team-wide pull request workflows.
HouseGarofaloAnalyze code for correctness, security, performance, and maintainability with severity-classified reports.
rikdcReview Go code for correctness, security, and performance issues.
forranyAutomate build, type check, lint, tests, security scan, and diff review for code changes.
popup-studio-aiAutomate architecture and code quality reviews with gap-analysis reports.
