golang-code-style

Enforce consistent Go code style for readability and correctness.

1|Updated May 26, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/tokiou/caba-inseguridad-v2-be --skill golang-code-style-tokiou
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: golang-code-style
Source: https://github.com/tokiou/caba-inseguridad-v2-be/tree/main/.claude/skills/golang-code-style
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/tokiou/caba-inseguridad-v2-be --skill golang-code-style-tokiou

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

💡 This Skill includes references (resource) components.

What problem does it solve?

It prevents Go codebases from drifting into inconsistent, hard-to-review patterns by codifying judgment-heavy style decisions that formatting and linters can’t fully handle.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Improve readability with rules for line breaking, control flow clarity (early returns, no unnecessary else), and complex-condition handling.
  • Reduce bugs and surprises by enforcing zero-value intent, avoiding nil slices/maps, and using named struct fields.
  • Standardize day-to-day practices for function design, pointer vs value parameter choices, code organization, string handling, and type conversions.
  • Use Cases: applying consistent conventions during development, reviewing existing Go code for style/clarity issues, and establishing project coding standards.

Quick Start

Ask an AI coding agent to review your Go files (or write new ones) using these conventions for clarity, including breaking long calls by semantic boundaries and preferring early returns.

Frequently Asked Questions about golang-code-style

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I standardize Go code style for readability and correctness across a codebase?

Standardize Go code style by codifying judgment-heavy decisions for function design, control flow, and zero-value intent. This prevents codebases from drifting into inconsistent, hard-to-review patterns that formatting and linters cannot fully handle.

What is the best way to review Go code for style and clarity issues?

Reviewing Go code for style involves enforcing rules like breaking long lines at semantic boundaries, preferring early returns, and using named struct fields to reduce bugs and standardize day-to-day practices.

When should I use := vs var to signal intent in Golang?

Use := vs var in Golang to signal initialization intent, alongside initializing empty slices or maps to avoid nil surprises. This enforces zero-value intent and standardizes variable initialization practices.

How do I handle complex boolean conditions and control flow in Go functions?

Handle complex boolean conditions in Go by extracting them to improve control flow clarity. Avoid unnecessary else blocks, prefer early returns, and break long calls by semantic boundaries to enhance readability.

Can I use this to establish project coding standards for Golang string handling and parameter choices?

Yes, you can establish project coding standards for Golang by applying conventions for string handling, type conversions, and pointer vs value parameter choices during development and code reviews.

Does this Go code style guidance replace standard linters and formatting tools?

No, this guidance handles judgment-heavy style decisions that standard formatting and linters cannot fully address. It complements them by codifying rules for control flow, variable initialization, and parameter choices to improve readability.