skills.rest
program-the-brain-not-the-heartbeat
program-the-brain-not-the-heartbeatCOMMUNITY
Explore all skills by this author →
GitHub

google-gemini-code-reviewer

Evaluate code changes in local worktrees or remote pull requests.

Updated Aug 27, 2026
Search Tags:#security#maintainability#quality-assurance#code-review#pull-request#local-changes#remote-pr
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/program-the-brain-not-the-heartbeat/dotfiles --skill google-gemini-code-reviewer
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent▼
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: google-gemini-code-reviewer
Source: https://github.com/program-the-brain-not-the-heartbeat/dotfiles/tree/main/config/claude/skills/google-gemini-code-reviewer
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/program-the-brain-not-the-heartbeat/dotfiles --skill google-gemini-code-reviewer

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

It streamlines thorough, consistent code reviews for changes in local worktrees and remote pull requests, reducing review time and improving quality.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Comprehensive analysis: checks correctness, maintainability, readability, and security across changes.
  • Dual-target workflow: handles local changes (staged or unstaged) and remote PRs by number or URL.
  • Actionable feedback: produces structured findings and concrete improvement suggestions.

Quick Start

Ask the agent to review your current changes or a specific PR by providing its number or URL.

Frequently Asked Questions about google-gemini-code-reviewer

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I review local code changes for maintainability and security before committing?▼

Review local code changes by applying structured checks for correctness, maintainability, readability, security, and testability to staged or unstaged worktrees, providing actionable feedback with clear findings and recommended changes.

Can I review a remote pull request by providing its URL or number?▼

Yes, you can review a remote pull request by providing its specific number or URL, allowing the system to identify and evaluate the code changes across the PR context for quality and security.

What is the best way to ensure test coverage during a pull request review?▼

Ensure test coverage during a pull request review by applying structured testability checks to the code changes, which generates actionable feedback and optional test coverage suggestions.

Does this code review process handle both local worktrees and remote PRs?▼

Yes, this code review process handles a dual-target workflow, identifying and evaluating code changes across both local worktrees and remote pull requests to improve quality and reduce review time.

How does automated code review evaluate correctness and readability?▼

Automated code review evaluates correctness and readability by applying structured checks to identified code changes, producing concrete improvement suggestions and structured findings for actionable feedback.

Related Skills

Explore More Software Engineering Skills→
Kord96Kord96

publish

Push the current git branch to origin with optional draft PR and Codex review.

Community
Intermediate
MovchanetsMovchanets

code-review-excellence

Review pull requests with severity-ranked findings on correctness, security, performance, and maintainability.

Community
Advanced
SkogAISkogAI
1

verification-before-completion

Run verification commands and report evidence before claiming completion.

Official
Basic
iiammaeiiammae

code-reviewer

Automate code review with Python scripts for quality and security checks.

Community
Advanced