goosetown-reviewer

Review Goosetown projects against specified criteria and report structured findings.

142|22|Updated Feb 19, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/block/goosetown --skill goosetown-reviewer
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: goosetown-reviewer
Source: https://github.com/block/goosetown/tree/main/.claude/skills/goosetown-reviewer
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/block/goosetown --skill goosetown-reviewer

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

This Skill automates the process of reviewing code or other work products against specified criteria, providing structured feedback and quality assessments without making direct changes.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Quality Assessment: Evaluates work based on correctness, security, performance, and code quality.
  • Issue Identification: Pinpoints specific problems with severity levels (high, medium, low).
  • Actionable Feedback: Provides clear recommendations for improvement.
  • Use Case: A developer submits a new feature. The Goosetown Reviewer Skill is invoked to assess the code for bugs, security vulnerabilities, and adherence to coding standards, reporting its findings to the orchestrator.

Quick Start

Use the goosetown-reviewer skill to assess the attached code changes for correctness and security.

Frequently Asked Questions about goosetown-reviewer

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I automate code review to identify security vulnerabilities and bugs?

Automated code review assesses work against specified criteria to identify security vulnerabilities and bugs, providing structured feedback including severity levels and actionable recommendations without altering the codebase.

What is structured quality assessment for code changes and how does it work?

Structured quality assessment evaluates code changes for correctness, completeness, security, performance, and edge cases, then reports findings in a format containing a verdict, score, detailed findings, and strengths.

How do I assess code quality for correctness, performance, and integration issues?

Assess code quality by evaluating work products against criteria focusing on correctness, performance, integration, and edge cases, generating a report with severity-ranked issues and suggestions for improvement.

Does automated code review provide actionable feedback without making direct changes?

Automated quality assessment provides actionable feedback and specific recommendations for improvement while operating strictly in a read-only capacity, ensuring no direct changes are made to the submitted code.

Can I evaluate edge cases and integration issues in my submitted code changes?

Evaluating edge cases and integration issues is supported during the quality assessment process, checking submitted work against specified criteria and reporting identified problems with assigned severity levels.

What is the best way to get a structured quality score and verdict for a new feature?

Obtain a structured quality score and verdict by submitting new features for assessment, which evaluates the code against criteria and outputs a final score, summary, and detailed findings report.