gormes-interface-designer

Evaluate interface shapes for Hermes/Honcho compatibility and migration costs.

9|Updated Apr 19, 2026

Search Tags:#design #architecture #interfaces #go #software-engineering #hermes #honcho

Ready to run

npx skills add https://github.com/TrebuchetDynamics/gormes-agent --skill gormes-interface-designer

💬 Prompt for ChatGPT / Claude Chat▼

Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: gormes-interface-designer
Source: https://github.com/TrebuchetDynamics/gormes-agent/tree/main/development-skills/gormes-interface-designer
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/TrebuchetDynamics/gormes-agent --skill gormes-interface-designer

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

💡 This Skill includes references (resource) components.

What problem does it solve?

The Gormes Interface Designer helps teams design modular, testable interfaces for providers, gateways, tools, sessions, memory, Goncho, plugins, APIs, and TUI seams, reducing coupling and guiding clear boundaries across Hermes components.

Core Features & Use Cases

Proposes multiple interface shapes to compare trade-offs.
Emphasizes Hermes/Honcho compatibility, testability, and migration considerations.
Use Case: design a boundary for a provider API to enable swapping implementations with minimal changes.

Quick Start

Draft two interface shapes for the target subsystem and compare their trade-offs.

Frequently Asked Questions about gormes-interface-designer

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema

How do I design Go interfaces for Hermes components that stay testable and modular?▼

Design Go interfaces for Hermes by identifying callers, contracts, and existing patterns, then evaluating at least two interface shapes for compatibility. The approach maps trade-offs across tests and migration costs to produce a recommended boundary design.

What is the best way to reduce coupling when swapping provider implementations in Go?▼

Reducing coupling when swapping provider implementations in Go requires proposing multiple interface shapes to compare trade-offs. You evaluate each shape against Hermes compatibility, testability, and migration impact across relevant modules before selecting a design.

Can I compare multiple interface shapes for a Go gateway before committing to a design?▼

Yes, comparing multiple interface shapes for a Go gateway is the core process. You draft at least two distinct interface designs and map their compatibility with Hermes, Honcho, tests, and migration costs to determine which boundary works best.

How do I plan migration costs when introducing new interface boundaries in Go modules?▼

Plan migration costs for new Go interface boundaries by mapping compatibility across relevant modules. The process evaluates at least two distinct interface shapes against existing tests and migration impact, producing a builder-ready row with a recommended design and implementation plan.

Does this interface design approach work with both Hermes and Honcho seams?▼

Yes, Hermes and Honcho compatibility is evaluated directly during interface design. Each proposed interface shape is mapped against both systems alongside testability and migration costs to ensure the boundary design supports providers, gateways, sessions, memory, and plugins.

What should I prepare before drafting interface boundaries for a Go subsystem?▼

Before drafting interface boundaries for a Go subsystem, identify existing callers, contracts, and current patterns. This context informs the evaluation of distinct interface shapes and ensures the proposed design aligns with Hermes and Honcho compatibility requirements.