gpd-respond-to-referees

Parse referee comments, triage issues, and coordinate manuscript revisions in the GPD framework.

1|Updated Mar 29, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/CharlieGreenman/roomtemp-superconductor-gpd --skill gpd-respond-to-referees
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: gpd-respond-to-referees
Source: https://github.com/CharlieGreenman/roomtemp-superconductor-gpd/tree/main/.agents/skills/gpd-respond-to-referees
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/CharlieGreenman/roomtemp-superconductor-gpd --skill gpd-respond-to-referees

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

Structure and coordinate point-by-point responses to referee reports and manage manuscript revisions within the GPD workflow, ensuring alignment between reviewer feedback, author notes, and the final submission artifacts.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Structured parsing of referee comments into actionable items (group A, B, and C) with clear priorities
  • Orchestrated revision workflow that spawns targeted manuscript-writer agents and tracks progress
  • Generation and synchronization of internal AUTHOR-RESPONSE.md and journal-facing REFEREE_RESPONSE.md plus a formal response letter, including evidence tracking and revision verification
  • End-to-end support for editor-initiated rounds, decision artifacts, and integration with review ledgers

Quick Start

Invoke the respond-to-referees workflow to parse referee reports, triage comments, coordinate revisions, and generate the internal and journal-facing response artifacts.

Frequently Asked Questions about gpd-respond-to-referees

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I automate point-by-point responses to referee reports for a scientific manuscript?

Automate peer-review responses by parsing referee comments, triaging issues into priority groups, and orchestrating manuscript revisions. The workflow generates structured response artifacts, including internal author notes, journal-facing responses, and formal response letters.

What is the best way to coordinate manuscript revisions and track changes requested by peer reviewers?

Coordinate manuscript revisions by spawning targeted revision-writer agents that track progress and verify changes against referee feedback. This workflow ensures alignment between reviewer requests, author notes, and the final submission artifacts through structured change-tracking.

Can I generate a formal response letter and internal author notes from referee comments automatically?

Yes, you can generate a formal response letter, an internal AUTHOR-RESPONSE.md, and a journal-facing REFEREE_RESPONSE.md directly from parsed referee comments. The process includes evidence tracking and revision verification for all generated artifacts.

How does a structured referee response workflow handle evidence tracking and revision verification?

Structured referee response workflows handle evidence tracking by mapping each referee comment to actionable revision items, coordinating targeted manuscript-writer agents, and verifying that every change is documented with provenance in the final response letter.

Do I need any specific frameworks or dependencies to orchestrate peer-review document automation?

No specific external dependencies are required to orchestrate peer-review document automation. The workflow operates within the GPD framework to parse referee reports, triage comments, and generate both internal and journal-facing response artifacts.

When should I use an automated referee-response workflow instead of manually managing manuscript revisions?

Use an automated referee-response workflow when managing scientific manuscripts undergoing peer review that require structured parsing, prioritized triage of referee comments, and synchronized generation of internal author responses and formal journal-facing response letters.