What problem does it solve? Grant administrators and applicants need a fast, consistent way to check whether an application meets published eligibility criteria before it reaches a review panel, without misinterpreting rules or wasting effort on ineligible submissions. ## Core Features & Use Cases - Criterion-by-Criterion Assessment: Evaluates each published criterion as met, not met, or undeterminable, and specifies exactly which evidence would settle uncertain cases. - Hard vs. Assessed Criteria Separation: Reports pass/fail on hard criteria like deadlines, geography, and applicant type, while assembling evidence for panel-scored criteria without scoring them. - Mandatory Integrity Checks: Always verifies the deadline, duplicate applications from the same body, and unacquitted prior grants. - Use Case: A public-sector grants officer receives an application and uses this Skill to produce a report listing hard criterion results first, followed by blocking evidence gaps, so ineligible applicants learn immediately. ## Quick Start Check this grant application against the published criteria and list what evidence is missing.