skills.rest
t46
t46COMMUNITY
Explore all skills by this author →
GitHub

grant-proposal-review

Analyze grant proposals and generate prioritized improvement recommendations.

14|3|Updated Apr 15, 2026
Search Tags:#review#funding#peer-review#grant-proposal#research-grants#proposal-improvement
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/t46/ra-skills --skill grant-proposal-review
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent▼
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: grant-proposal-review
Source: https://github.com/t46/ra-skills/tree/main/skills/grant-proposal-review
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/t46/ra-skills --skill grant-proposal-review

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

Reviewers and grant-ops teams often spend excessive time evaluating proposals and drafting improvement suggestions. This skill streamlines the analysis process and surfaces concrete edits to increase funding chances.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Structured evaluation: Applies standardized criteria to identify strengths and gaps in grant proposals.
  • Actionable feedback: Produces prioritized improvement recommendations with concrete wording.
  • Use Case: A research group submits a proposal; the skill outputs a prioritized edit plan and a checker to ensure alignment with funding criteria.

Quick Start

Provide the target grant proposal document and fund type to generate an evaluation report with prioritized improvements.

Frequently Asked Questions about grant-proposal-review

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I review a grant proposal and identify gaps before submission?▼

You can review grant proposals by providing the target document and fund type to generate a structured evaluation report, which surfaces prioritized issues and concrete wording suggestions for proposal improvement.

What is the best way to get actionable feedback on a research grant application?▼

Actionable feedback is generated by analyzing the proposal document alongside the fund type and prior submission history, yielding a structured evaluation with concrete edits that align with institutional funding criteria.

Can I use this proposal review process for institutional grants like KAKENHI or JST?▼

This review process supports institutional grant calls including KAKENHI, JST, and CREST by accepting the fund type as input and generating a customized evaluation report with prioritized issues and reform suggestions.

How do I generate a prioritized edit plan for a research proposal?▼

A prioritized edit plan is generated by analyzing the grant proposal against standardized criteria, producing a checker to ensure alignment with funding requirements and surfacing concrete wording improvements.

Does prior submission history affect how my grant proposal is evaluated?▼

Including prior submission history alongside the proposal document and fund type enables the evaluation process to generate more tailored feedback, prioritizing issues based on past application contexts.

Related Skills

Explore More Education & Research Skills→
Victory-HugoVictory-Hugo
1

research-grants

Generate agency-compliant grant proposals for NSF, NIH, DOE, and DARPA.

Community
Advanced
dayvidphamdayvidpham
2

Reviewer: Review Plan

Automate PROPOSAL-N plan reviews with ACCEPT/REVISE voting and Beads task updates.

Community
Advanced
ExuberantWitnessExuberantWitness
1

flux-review-loop

Automate multi-round academic paper reviews and iterative manuscript refinement.

Community
Advanced
schneidermuschneidermu

peer-review

Guide reviewers through staged manuscript and grant evaluation checklists.

Community
Advanced