What problem does it solve?
Clinical researchers struggle to identify the right NIH institutes, mechanisms, and study sections for their research ideas, often wasting months on misaligned applications. This Skill turns a research idea into a strategic NIH funding overview as an editable .docx, grounded in live Consensus literature searches and RePORTER project data.
Core Features & Use Cases
- Structured Intake: Six forcing questions lock down research idea, career stage, preliminary data, environment, submission posture, and institute targets before any search runs.
- Positioning Analysis: Runs five sequential Consensus searches (established, stakes, current approaches, adjacent methods, gaps) and drafts Significance/Innovation language with quotable gap citations.
- Institute & Mechanism Mapping: Queries NIH RePORTER via POST to tally funding institutes and study sections, discovers NOSIs, and matches career stage × scope × preliminary data to mechanisms (F31 through U01) via a rule-based matcher.
- Audited DOCX Output: Produces a 9-section Word document with hyperlinked references, submission timelines, a mandatory program officer recommendation, and a full audit log of queries sent, results received, and results cited.
- Use Case: A postdoc with pilot data asks "find grants for my sepsis prediction research" and receives a .docx naming NHLBI as the top institute, recommending K99/R00, listing active NOSIs, and providing a program officer contact plan.
Quick Start
Ask the agent to find NIH grant opportunities for your research idea and answer the six intake questions about your career stage and preliminary data.