graph-builder

Build incremental ownership graphs with capped impact-walk depth for file navigation.

Updated May 11, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/AesopScott/mojo --skill graph-builder-aesopscott
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: graph-builder
Source: https://github.com/AesopScott/mojo/tree/main/harnesses/skills/graph-builder
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/AesopScott/mojo --skill graph-builder-aesopscott

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

This Skill addresses latency and bottlenecks in large-scale file navigation by providing a structured, incremental approach to building ownership graphs and managing impact-walk depth.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Incremental Graph Building: Updates ownership graphs efficiently without re-scanning entire trees.
  • Impact-Walk Capping: Prevents performance degradation by limiting the depth of dependency analysis.
  • Use Case: When a developer experiences slow response times while navigating a large codebase, this skill provides a systematic way to identify the bottleneck and apply a targeted performance patch.

Quick Start

Use the graph-builder skill to analyze the current file navigation performance and propose a configuration change to cap the impact-walk depth.

Frequently Asked Questions about graph-builder

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I optimize file navigation performance in a large-scale codebase?

You can optimize file navigation performance by building incremental ownership graphs and capping impact-walk depth to prevent latency bottlenecks. This approach systematically identifies slow response times and applies targeted performance patches without re-scanning entire directory trees.

What is incremental ownership graph building for dependency tracking?

Incremental ownership graph building updates dependency mappings efficiently without re-scanning entire repository trees. It targets large-scale software repositories by progressively analyzing file ownership and dependencies, ensuring system responsiveness while maintaining accurate path caching.

Can I cap impact-walk depth to prevent dependency analysis degradation?

Yes, impact-walk capping limits the depth of dependency analysis to prevent performance degradation. By precisely configuring graph-build increments and depth-capping logic, you ensure system responsiveness and avoid latency bottlenecks during large-scale file navigation.

Does graph-builder work for large-scale software repositories requiring path caching?

Graph-builder is designed specifically for large-scale software repositories requiring efficient dependency tracking and path caching. It manages impact-walk depth and builds incremental ownership graphs to maintain navigation responsiveness in complex codebases.

What's the best way to fix slow response times when navigating large codebases?

The best way to fix navigation latency is analyzing current file navigation performance and proposing configuration changes to cap impact-walk depth. This structured approach builds incremental ownership graphs to identify bottlenecks and apply targeted performance patches.

When should I not use incremental graph building for file navigation?

Incremental graph building is not ideal when you need exhaustive full-tree rescans or lack precise configuration control over graph-build increments. Without proper depth-capping logic, impact-walk analysis may still degrade system responsiveness in complex repositories.