graphics-evaluator

Analyze logos, symbols, and icons for formal coherence and optical correctness.

Updated Nov 27, 2025
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/SonnySSSSSSS/Immanence --skill graphics-evaluator
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: graphics-evaluator
Source: https://github.com/SonnySSSSSSS/Immanence/tree/main/skills/formal-graphic-coherence-critique
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/SonnySSSSSSS/Immanence --skill graphics-evaluator

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

This Skill addresses the challenge of identifying and rectifying subtle formal inconsistencies in graphic marks, ensuring they possess optical correctness and symbolic legibility without requiring a full redesign.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Formal Coherence Analysis: Evaluates logos, symbols, and icons against established principles of graphic design.
  • Optical Balance Assessment: Identifies issues with visual weight and perceived symmetry.
  • Minimal Correction Proposals: Suggests precise, actionable adjustments to improve form and legibility.
  • Use Case: A designer has a new icon for a mobile app but feels it's "not quite right." This Skill can pinpoint specific alignment or weight issues and suggest minor tweaks to improve its visual appeal and clarity at small sizes.

Quick Start

Evaluate the attached logo image for formal coherence and suggest minimal corrections.

Frequently Asked Questions about graphics-evaluator

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I critique a logo for optical balance and formal coherence?

To critique a logo for optical balance, analyze its geometry, stroke behavior, negative space, and gestalt principles to identify visual weight issues and propose minimal corrections for symbolic legibility.

What is optical correctness in icon evaluation and why does it matter?

Optical correctness in icon evaluation ensures perceived symmetry and visual weight compensate for geometric inaccuracies, which is critical for maintaining symbolic legibility and form clarity at small sizes.

How do I fix visual coherence issues in a mobile app icon without redesigning it?

Fix visual coherence issues by applying minimal, specific corrections to stroke behavior and negative space based on gestalt principles, enhancing form and clarity without altering the core design concept.

When should I use a graphic design critique tool for form analysis?

Use a graphic design critique tool for form analysis when a logo or icon feels "not quite right" and you need to pinpoint subtle formal inconsistencies in optical balance before finalizing the mark.

Does this approach redesign the core concept of a logo during evaluation?

No, this approach does not redesign the core concept during evaluation; it focuses on analyzing geometry and gestalt principles to propose precise, minimal adjustments that enhance optical correctness and visual coherence.

What design elements are analyzed during an icon evaluation for visual coherence?

An icon evaluation for visual coherence analyzes geometry, stroke behavior, negative space, optical balance, and gestalt principles to identify formal inconsistencies and suggest specific corrections for clarity.