grclanker

Assess CMVP validation, KEV exposure, EPSS likelihood, and control mapping.

21|6|Updated Mar 29, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/hackIDLE/grclanker --skill grclanker
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: grclanker
Source: https://github.com/hackIDLE/grclanker/tree/main/skills/grclanker
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/hackIDLE/grclanker --skill grclanker

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

It resolves uncertainty in crypto validation and exploited-vulnerability exposure by structuring FIPS, KEV, EPSS, and control-mapping evidence into an auditable compliance posture.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Evidence-Driven Crypto & Vulnerability Analysis: Validates FIPS status using certificate/CMVP evidence and triages exploitation likelihood using KEV entries and EPSS scores.
  • Framework-Mapped GRC Posture: Maps findings to concrete controls (e.g., NIST 800-53, FedRAMP, CMMC, SOC 2, ISO 27001) and explicitly flags gaps or uncertainty.
  • Implementation-Ready Spec to Workflows: Turns grclanker spec files into actionable investigation/audit/assessment workflows for compliance and engineering follow-through.

Quick Start

Use the grclanker skill to assess a module or product for CMVP validation evidence, KEV exposure, EPSS likelihood, and framework control coverage in one evidence-backed output.

Frequently Asked Questions about grclanker

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I map FIPS validation evidence to NIST 800-53 controls?

Mapping FIPS validation evidence to NIST 800-53 controls requires structuring CMVP certificate artifacts into an auditable compliance posture. This approach validates cryptographic status while explicitly flagging framework mapping gaps or uncertainty.

What is the best way to triage CVEs using KEV and EPSS scores for compliance?

Triaging CVEs using KEV and EPSS scores involves investigating exploited-vulnerability exposure and estimating exploitation likelihood. This evidence-backed method translates vulnerability findings into framework-mapped GRC posture with explicit uncertainty marking for audits.

Can I use grclanker specs to generate SOC 2 or FedRAMP audit workflows?

Yes, you can use grclanker spec files to generate implementation-ready SOC 2 or FedRAMP audit workflows. The specs translate cryptographic validation and vulnerability triage evidence into actionable assessment workflows for engineering follow-through.

Does CMVP validation status checking support CMMC and ISO 27001 frameworks?

CMVP validation status checking supports CMMC and ISO 27001 frameworks through framework-mapped GRC posture translation. It structures FIPS, KEV, and EPSS evidence into concrete controls across these mapped families while flagging compliance gaps.

Why does GRC mapping require explicit uncertainty marking during vulnerability triage?

GRC mapping requires explicit uncertainty marking during vulnerability triage to ensure evidence-backed assertions remain auditable. Marking uncertainty prevents overstating compliance posture when validating FIPS status or estimating EPSS exploitation likelihood.