grill

Analyze project documentation and codebase context to distinguish facts from open decisions.

Updated May 3, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/druejaramillo/skills --skill grill-druejaramillo
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: grill
Source: https://github.com/druejaramillo/skills/tree/main/project/grill
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/druejaramillo/skills --skill grill-druejaramillo

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

This skill resolves ambiguity in product, design, and architectural planning by forcing a structured, evidence-based dialogue between the user and the AI, preventing costly assumptions.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Structured Decision Mapping: Categorizes inputs into facts, assumptions, and decisions to clarify project direction.
  • Evidence-Based Resolution: Prioritizes existing documentation and codebase facts over speculation.
  • Use Case: Use this when you need to align stakeholders on a complex architectural trade-off or when you want to stress-test a new feature plan before implementation.

Quick Start

Invoke the grill skill by asking the assistant to help you evaluate your current project plan for potential risks and missing decisions.

Frequently Asked Questions about grill

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I resolve architectural uncertainties and align stakeholders on complex product decisions?

Resolving architectural uncertainties requires distinguishing established facts from open decisions through structured inquiry. This approach analyzes existing project documentation and codebase context to provide evidence-based recommendations, preventing costly assumptions during product planning.

What is the best way to stress-test a new feature plan before implementation?

Stress-testing a feature plan involves categorizing project inputs into facts, assumptions, and decisions. Facilitating a structured interview process clarifies project direction and identifies missing decisions, ensuring alignment before development begins.

How do I track confirmed architectural decisions to ensure project alignment?

Tracking confirmed architectural decisions uses standardized documentation records and ADRs. Systematically recording these decisions ensures project alignment and maintains a clear history of evidence-based resolutions for future reference.

Can I use existing project documentation to evaluate potential risks in my current plan?

Existing project documentation and codebase context can be used to evaluate potential risks. Evidence-based resolution prioritizes these documented facts over speculation to identify missing decisions and architectural trade-offs.

When do I need structured decision mapping for architectural trade-offs?

Structured decision mapping is needed when facing complex architectural trade-offs that require stakeholder alignment. It resolves ambiguity in product and design planning by forcing an evidence-based dialogue that categorizes inputs into actionable facts and open decisions.

Why does resolving product ambiguity require distinguishing between facts and open decisions?

Resolving product ambiguity requires separating facts from open decisions to prevent costly assumptions. This structured approach ensures that planning recommendations are grounded in codebase evidence and documented facts rather than speculation.