grill-me

To stress-test a project plan, you drive an interview that asks one question at a time to resolve branching decisions and dependencies. This clarifies incomplete requirements and identifies tradeoffs until a shared understanding is reached.

Reviewing system design tradeoffs requires iteratively walking through the decision tree to expose how earlier choices constrain later decisions. This dependency-aware clarification reveals gaps and validates the architecture step-by-step.

Yes, clarifying ambiguous product planning requirements involves resolving branching decisions through a relentless interview process. It provides recommended answers for each question to move the plan forward and confirms shared understanding.

Codebase exploration during a design review examines the repository to answer questions about the plan instead of guessing. This codebase-first approach ensures dependency-aware clarification is grounded in actual architecture constraints.

You should use a decision tree interview for requirements clarification when tradeoffs are uncertain or requirements are incomplete. It forces you to confront unanswered questions and dependency constraints until both sides agree on the final approach.