Question design decisions iteratively to validate feasibility and surface risks.
npx skills add https://github.com/akillness/jeo-skills --skill grill-me-akillness
Please help me install this Agent Skill. Skill: grill-me Source: https://github.com/akillness/jeo-skills/tree/main/.agent-skills/grill-me Command: npx skills add https://github.com/akillness/jeo-skills --skill grill-me-akillness
Conduct a rigorous vetting process for plans, designs, or architectures by systematically questioning every decision point, tracing interdependencies, and traversing the complete decision tree to surface risks and open questions.
Trigger a session by stating "grill me" with a design or plan to stress-test, and follow the prompts as the interviewer guides the discussion.
High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.
To stress-test an architecture, you can trigger a session by stating "grill me" alongside your design. The system systematically questions every decision point, traversing the complete decision tree to surface risks, open questions, and feasibility constraints.
Validating dependencies and edge cases requires branch-by-branch traversal of design options with rigorous scrutiny. This approach iteratively questions decisions one at a time, recording traceable rationale for each choice to assess risks and align with constraints.
Yes, this process applies directly to architectural reviews, plan validation, and design vetting workflows. It actively drives comprehensive design critique by questioning decisions and dependencies to validate feasibility and alignment with project constraints.
Documenting trade-offs during a design review involves structured interrogation that asks one question at a time and records rationale. This produces clear artifacts including documented decisions, remaining questions, and trade-offs to inform stakeholders.
Design vetting requires a proposed plan or architecture as input but does not need a pre-defined decision tree. The interviewer guides the discussion stepwise, traversing design options branch-by-branch to resolve dependencies and surface open questions.
Systematic questioning helps with plan validation because it enforces disciplined, stepwise scrutiny of every decision point. Tracing interdependencies across the complete decision tree surfaces hidden risks and validates alignment with project constraints.
vadirnInterrogate plans and designs to detect weaknesses, contradictions, and missing information.
zhanglongxiao111Turn user intent into an approved design specification before implementation.
gonzalezpazmonicaCalculate SPACE metrics and aggregate portfolio scores across multiple projects.
vinaykumarvkScan codebases for security flaws, quality issues, and accessibility violations.
