Guide teams through structured questioning to reach shared understanding of plans.
npx skills add https://github.com/Alfie728/my-skills --skill grill-me-alfie728
Please help me install this Agent Skill. Skill: grill-me Source: https://github.com/Alfie728/my-skills/tree/main/grill-me Command: npx skills add https://github.com/Alfie728/my-skills --skill grill-me-alfie728
Interview the user relentlessly about a plan or design until reaching shared understanding, resolving each branch of the decision tree. Use when the user wants to stress-test a plan, get grilled on their design, or explicitly mentions "grill me".
Ask one sharp question at a time to drive the plan toward explicit decisions, risks, and trade-offs until shared understanding is achieved.
High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.
You stress-test a plan by applying relentless, focused questioning that reveals assumptions, constraints, and risks. This systematic traversal of the decision tree closes open branches and aligns scope, interfaces, and rollout considerations.
A decision tree approach for design reviews resolves each branch through pointed, sequential inquiries. It drives the plan toward explicit decisions and trade-offs until shared understanding is achieved across the team.
You conduct interactive questioning by asking one sharp question at a time. This prompts structured inquiries into scope, risks, interfaces, and rollout considerations, driving the plan toward explicit decisions.
Yes, focused questioning systematically traverses the decision tree to define scope and surface rollout risks. Contextual summaries are generated during the process to surface decisions for quick validation or correction.
The best way to align teams is through relentless, focused questioning that resolves each branch of the decision tree. It ensures decisions are explicit and trade-offs are thoroughly examined until shared understanding is reached.
You should avoid relentless questioning when a plan or design is already fully explicit with no open decision branches. It is specifically built for scenarios requiring scope definition, risk examination, and unresolved trade-offs.
pingqLINDraft executable plans with objective, scope, steps, and verification before work.
supertyrelleCompare architectural options and synthesize a recommendation with trade-offs.
jchildreeEvaluate plans and designs through structured decision-tree questioning.
tunnckoCoreIdentify omissions, limitations, and gaps in non-fiction writing.
