grill-me

Stress-tests plans and designs through self-interrogation when no human reviewer is available.

2|Updated Jul 25, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/ankaboot-source/boucle --skill grill-me-ankaboot-source
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: grill-me
Source: https://github.com/ankaboot-source/boucle/tree/main/.jcode/skills/grill-me
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/ankaboot-source/boucle --skill grill-me-ankaboot-source

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve? In CI or autonomous agent workflows, no human reviewer is available to challenge a plan or design before implementation. This Skill fills that gap by having the agent interrogate its own artifact, exposing edge cases, contradictions, and unstated assumptions before code is written. ## Core Features & Use Cases - Self-Interrogation Loop: Generates at least 10 tough, skeptical reviewer questions targeting edge cases, undefined terms, contradictions, and scope leaks. - Honest Gap Flagging: Answers each question from the codebase and issue context, marking unanswerable items as needs-human instead of inventing answers. - Plan Hardening with Audit Trail: Applies every answer back into the artifact with before/after diffs, producing a hardened plan plus a full question-and-answer record. - Use Case: An autonomous CI agent drafts an implementation plan for a GitHub issue, then runs a self-grill to catch missing acceptance criteria and surface open decisions for human confirmation. ## Quick Start Ask the agent to grill the current implementation plan and list any questions it cannot answer without human input.

Frequently Asked Questions about grill-me

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I review a plan when no human reviewer is available?

Run a self-grill: state the plan, generate at least ten skeptical reviewer questions covering edge cases and unstated assumptions, answer each from available context, and apply the answers back into the plan. Unanswerable questions are flagged as needs-human.

How to stress-test a design document with an AI agent?

Have the agent play both interviewer and answerer against the design. It produces tough questions about contradictions, missing acceptance criteria, and scope leaks, then updates the artifact with before/after changes and an audit trail.

Can this skill be invoked automatically by the model?

No. The skill sets disable-model-invocation to true and its agent policy disallows implicit invocation, so it only runs when explicitly requested by the user or orchestrating workflow.

What happens when a question cannot be answered without a human?

The question is marked needs-human along with the missing input required. These items are surfaced at the end as open decisions a human reviewer must confirm, rather than being answered with invented content.

What are the limitations of self-interrogation for plan review?

Self-interrogation cannot replace genuine human judgment on business priorities or ambiguous requirements. It mitigates this by flagging low-confidence decisions and needs-human gaps instead of fabricating answers.