grill-me

Document decision provenance by running an interactive interview that records human choices and AI assumptions directly into the issue body. This ensures all architectural decisions are auditable before workflow execution begins.

Resolving ambiguities in high-stakes requirements requires guiding stakeholders through a structured decision tree. This interactive process systematically addresses branching logic one step at a time to force alignment.

Front-load critical decisions by initiating an interactive requirement gathering process tied to an active issue ID. This forces human participation to validate functional choices before any code is written.

An active issue ID is required to start the interactive requirement gathering process. The system uses this identifier to anchor the decision tree resolution and append provenance data to the correct issue body.

Use an interactive interview process for issue tracking when tackling a high-impact feature or architectural change. It prevents costly rework by forcing stakeholders to validate critical choices before the implementation workflow starts.

Requirement gathering requires human participation to validate critical architectural and functional choices. The system operates by guiding users through the decision tree, but humans must actively resolve ambiguities and confirm one-way door decisions.