grill-me

To interrogate a design plan and uncover assumptions, you need a structured questioning process that walks down each branch of the decision tree. This approach relentlessly explores each branch one question at a time to validate dependencies and reach shared understanding.

The best way to resolve dependencies between decisions in architecture planning is through branch-by-branch decision tree exploration. By isolating each decision and validating its dependencies one-by-one, you systematically eliminate ambiguity and align stakeholders on the architecture.

Yes, you can use your codebase to ground questions during a strategy session review. The interrogation process can reference codebase or project documents directly to ensure every question and recommended answer is anchored to your actual technical implementation.

To start a one-question-at-a-time interview for your project plan, provide a concise plan summary. The skill will then begin relentlessly grilling every decision branch, providing a recommended answer for each question until all dependencies are resolved.

Yes, this approach works for complex design reviews with multiple overlapping branches. It preserves conversation state across branches, allowing you to navigate a complex decision tree and resolve dependencies without losing context during the interrogation.