Critique plans or drafts through systematic questioning and multi-perspective review.
npx skills add https://github.com/cnhx/prd-writer --skill grill-me-cnhx
Please help me install this Agent Skill. Skill: grill-me Source: https://github.com/cnhx/prd-writer/tree/main/grill-me Command: npx skills add https://github.com/cnhx/prd-writer --skill grill-me-cnhx
This Skill helps users thoroughly evaluate and improve their plans or designs by conducting detailed, systematic stress tests and critiques.
Ask the Skill to review your draft by saying "please review the attached PRD" or "run a critique on this plan".
High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.
To critique a draft, you can use the Review Mode to analyze existing documents from multiple perspectives, highlighting areas for improvement and suggesting specific corrections. This systematic evaluation reveals potential flaws in product design or technical documentation.
Stress testing a strategic plan involves using Interview Mode, which guides you through comprehensive questioning to identify weaknesses and ambiguities. This iterative analysis ensures comprehensive quality assurance and validates the robustness of your strategic planning.
Yes, you can evaluate a product requirements document by asking the Skill to review the attached PRD. It will conduct a detailed systematic stress test, analyzing the draft to reveal potential flaws and suggest enhancements for the product manager.
The review process supports iterative analysis and guided improvements by conducting detailed evaluation through systematic questioning and critique. This ensures comprehensive quality assurance across multiple review modes for your plans or drafts.
Use Interview Mode for design evaluation when you need to comprehensively question a plan to identify weaknesses, and use Review Mode when you have existing drafts or documents that need analysis from multiple perspectives with suggested corrections.
Automated critique for technical documentation facilitates detailed evaluation and systematic stress testing, but limitations arise if the provided draft lacks sufficient detail for the iterative analysis to identify ambiguities and suggest meaningful corrections.
FabienDehopreChallenge plans and designs through structured critical questioning.
harshitsinghbhandariDesign, assemble, and iterate Claude-ready Skills with structured evaluation.
JeanDiableAnalyze academic manuscript PDFs and generate ICML-style revision plans.
silversteinEvaluate scientific manuscripts for methodological, statistical, ethical, and reporting rigor.
