grill-me

Analyze project plans through iterative Socratic questioning to identify logical gaps.

7|Updated Mar 15, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/Cobalt-Money/Cobalt --skill grill-me-cobalt-money
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: grill-me
Source: https://github.com/Cobalt-Money/Cobalt/tree/main/.agents/skills/grill-me
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/Cobalt-Money/Cobalt --skill grill-me-cobalt-money

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

This Skill addresses the lack of critical oversight in early-stage planning by forcing you to defend your design decisions against a rigorous, systematic interrogation.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Decision Tree Resolution: Systematically explores every branch of your design to identify hidden dependencies and logical gaps.
  • Shared Understanding: Ensures that all stakeholders or project contributors are aligned by resolving ambiguities through iterative questioning.
  • Use Case: Use this when you have a draft architecture or project roadmap and need to identify potential failure points before implementation begins.

Quick Start

Invoke the grill-me skill by providing your project plan and asking the assistant to begin the interrogation process.

Frequently Asked Questions about grill-me

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I stress-test my project architecture for hidden dependencies and logical gaps?

Critical analysis of project plans identifies failure points by forcing you to defend design decisions against rigorous interrogation. It systematically explores every branch of your architecture to resolve ambiguities and align stakeholders before implementation begins.

How do I conduct a Socratic questioning session to analyze my project roadmap?

Conducting Socratic analysis of a roadmap requires multi-turn conversation state to ensure comprehensive design coverage. You provide your draft plan, and the system maintains context across iterative questions to interrogate your architecture systematically.

When do I need critical analysis for my design architecture?

You need critical analysis for design architecture when facing complex decision-making scenarios in early-stage planning. If you have a draft roadmap and must identify potential failure points or edge cases before execution, this interrogation process is essential.

Can I use iterative questioning to align stakeholders on a complex project plan?

Yes, iterative questioning aligns stakeholders by resolving ambiguities through systematic decision tree resolution. Exploring every design branch forces contributors to defend their decisions, ensuring shared understanding of the architecture before implementation proceeds.

What are the limitations of using Socratic questioning for architecture planning?

Socratic questioning for architecture planning requires a draft design to interrogate and cannot generate plans from scratch. It also requires maintaining multi-turn conversation state, making it less suitable for quick, isolated decisions or simple tasks lacking complex dependencies.