Interrogate plans and designs through iterative questioning to resolve decision dependencies.
npx skills add https://github.com/EstebanForge/AGENTS --skill grill-me-estebanforge
Please help me install this Agent Skill. Skill: grill-me Source: https://github.com/EstebanForge/AGENTS/tree/main/skills/grill-me Command: npx skills add https://github.com/EstebanForge/AGENTS --skill grill-me-estebanforge
This Skill helps users thoroughly test and refine their plans or designs by engaging in detailed questioning to uncover gaps and dependencies.
Ask the AI to simulate an exhaustive review session of your current plan or design, exploring every branch until mutual understanding is achieved.
High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.
To stress-test system architecture, engage in an iterative interrogation of your design decisions to uncover gaps and resolve dependencies. This process exposes overlooked issues by challenging every assumption until shared understanding is achieved.
Design validation through relentless interrogation is a review process that guides you through detailed questioning of plans. It clarifies complex decision trees and ensures thorough understanding by exploring related code or documentation for comprehensive feedback.
You can resolve complex decision tree dependencies by simulating an exhaustive review session that systematically questions each design branch. This clarifies unresolved dependencies by demanding thorough exploration of related documentation and logic.
Yes, you can use an interrogation approach for design review on an existing system architecture. The process plays the role of an interrogative partner to challenge and validate your current design decisions, exposing overlooked structural issues.
The best way to uncover gaps in a software design plan is through detailed questioning that targets decision dependencies. Relentlessly challenging the design reveals hidden flaws and ensures the entire project team reaches mutual understanding.
You should avoid iterative questioning for design validation when you need rapid, high-level approvals rather than deep architectural analysis. This approach requires exploring every branch and related documentation, which is unsuitable for quick conceptual reviews.
richardaumInterrogate plans or designs through systematic decision-tree analysis.
dhar174Analyze codebases to generate architecture blueprints with diagrams and documentation.
borkwebOrchestrate structured design sessions to gather context and validate assumptions.
Chang-Shih-YungAggregate type checker, linter, and test results into a 0-10 composite score.
