grill-me

Runs a structured interview session to challenge and refine a plan or design.

Updated Jul 31, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/julianckt/adoptarun --skill grill-me-julianckt
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: grill-me
Source: https://github.com/julianckt/adoptarun/tree/main/.agents/skills/grill-me
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/julianckt/adoptarun --skill grill-me-julianckt

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve? Plans and designs often contain hidden assumptions, gaps, and weak points that go unnoticed until implementation. This Skill subjects your plan to a relentless question-and-answer session that exposes flaws before you commit resources. ## Core Features & Use Cases - Adversarial Interviewing: Runs a grilling session that probes your plan or design with tough, targeted questions. - Assumption Surfacing: Forces you to articulate and defend decisions, revealing unstated assumptions and logical gaps. - Use Case: Before presenting a product roadmap to stakeholders, run a grilling session to anticipate the hard questions executives will ask and strengthen weak points in your reasoning. ## Quick Start Ask the assistant to run a grilling session on your current plan or design document.

Frequently Asked Questions about grill-me

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I stress-test a plan before presenting it?

Run a grilling session where the plan is subjected to relentless, targeted questions that expose weak assumptions and gaps. This simulates the scrutiny you would face from stakeholders or reviewers.

What is a grilling session for design review?

A grilling session is an adversarial interview format where your design or plan is challenged with probing questions. It helps surface hidden flaws and forces you to defend or revise your decisions.

Can I use this interview approach for product roadmaps?

Yes, the grilling format works for any plan or design artifact, including product roadmaps, technical designs, and business strategies. It is most useful before high-stakes reviews or commitments.

When should I not use an adversarial plan review?

Avoid it for early brainstorming stages where ideas are still forming, since aggressive questioning can shut down exploration. It works best once a plan is concrete enough to defend.