grill-me

Stress-tests high-risk memory drafts and conclusions before durable knowledge promotion.

1|Updated Jun 10, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/manhua-man/session-distill-skills --skill grill-me-manhua-man
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent▼
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: grill-me
Source: https://github.com/manhua-man/session-distill-skills/tree/main/helpers/grill-me
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/manhua-man/session-distill-skills --skill grill-me-manhua-man

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve? When AI session distillation produces candidate conclusions that could become durable project knowledge, overgeneralized or weakly evidenced claims can slip into the knowledge base. This Skill applies adversarial scrutiny to high-risk drafts before they are promoted, catching failure modes early. ## Core Features & Use Cases - Adversarial Pressure Testing: Challenges candidate conclusions with verdicts of keep, narrow, defer, or reject. - Evidence Gap Analysis: Identifies strongest evidence, missing evidence, and likely failure modes for each draft. - Safer Wording Proposals: Suggests narrower phrasing when a conclusion should survive with reduced scope. - Use Case: A distilled session note claims a new project rule applies globally. Run this Skill during candidate review to determine whether the claim is product truth, workflow preference, or local-only context before it becomes durable guidance. ## Quick Start Ask the assistant to pressure-test this candidate conclusion with grill-me before promoting it to durable memory.

Frequently Asked Questions about grill-me

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I pressure-test a conclusion before promoting it to durable memory?▼

Invoke grill-me during the candidate review stage with the draft conclusion. It returns a verdict of keep, narrow, defer, or reject, plus strongest evidence, missing evidence, failure modes, and safer wording if the conclusion should survive.

When should I use adversarial review for session distillation candidates?▼

Use it when a draft would change project rules, agent behavior, or user-facing guidance, when evidence exists but the conclusion may be overgeneralized, or when a conflict candidate needs sharper failure-mode analysis.

Does grill-me approve or write memory entries itself?▼

No. It only returns a pressure-test note with a verdict and analysis. It does not promote entries, create candidates, or write to the memory backend; the standard confirm or reject flow still applies.

Is grill-me required for the session distillation pipeline to work?▼

No. It is an optional collaborator outside the default session-distill main chain. The pipeline must not block when it is unavailable, and its absence is not treated as an error.

What are the limitations of adversarial conclusion review?▼

It only evaluates the evidence and wording presented in the candidate draft; it cannot gather new code evidence or verify claims against the codebase. Pair it with evidence-gathering tools for claims needing toolchain verification.