grill-me

To stress-test a technical plan, interrogate its design one question at a time to resolve ambiguities and expose missing assumptions before implementation. This branch-by-branch dependency resolution ensures all tradeoffs are fully shared and validated.

Decision tree interrogation for design review is a process of walking through each plan dependency one question at a time. It provides recommended answers for each branch to keep the architecture discussion focused, actionable, and free of unresolved ambiguity.

Yes, you can use codebase exploration to clarify questions during a planning review. When a question can be answered from existing code, the system inspects the repository to provide context, ensuring the design stress test is grounded in actual project state.

To conduct an adversarial planning session, apply branch-by-branch interrogation to your architecture discussions. By challenging each decision point with recommended answers and resolving dependencies sequentially, you rigorously test the implementation approach before committing.

Yes, this approach works for resolving ambiguity in any implementation plan. It applies to planning reviews, architecture discussions, and any situation where a rigorous stress test of decisions is needed to uncover weak assumptions and missing dependencies.