grill-me

Interrogate plan and design decision trees to surface hidden gaps.

10|2|Updated Dec 29, 2025
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/sumpalabs/petrodb --skill grill-me-sumpalabs
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: grill-me
Source: https://github.com/sumpalabs/petrodb/tree/main/.agents/skills/grill-me
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/sumpalabs/petrodb --skill grill-me-sumpalabs

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

This Skill solves the problem of moving forward with unvetted plans or designs that have hidden gaps, misaligned stakeholder assumptions, or unresolved decision branches that lead to costly rework, failed projects, or misaligned team output.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Systematic Design Interrogation: Walks through every branch of a plan or design decision tree to surface hidden flaws and unaddressed edge cases.
  • Dependency Resolution: Identifies and resolves dependencies between interconnected decisions one at a time to avoid conflicting choices.
  • Use Case: Use this when you have a new product feature design, project roadmap, or technical architecture and want to stress-test it for weaknesses before committing engineering or business resources.

Quick Start

Ask the grill-me skill to interrogate your proposed Q4 product launch plan to identify gaps and align your team on key decisions.

Frequently Asked Questions about grill-me

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I stress-test a product plan to find hidden gaps before execution?

Stress-testing a product plan requires systematically interrogating every branch of the design decision tree to surface hidden flaws, unaddressed edge cases, and unresolved dependencies before committing resources.

What is design validation and when do I need it for project roadmap development?

Design validation is the structured interrogation of proposed plans to reach shared stakeholder understanding. You need it for project roadmap development when resolving conflicting choices and aligning stakeholder assumptions before resource commitment.

Can I use this to resolve conflicting choices in technical architecture design?

Yes, you can resolve conflicting choices in technical architecture design by identifying and resolving dependencies between interconnected decisions one at a time to avoid misaligned team output and costly rework.

How do I align stakeholders on a Q4 product launch plan?

Aligning stakeholders on a product launch plan involves a step-by-step interrogation of the proposed design decision tree to surface misaligned assumptions, resolve decision dependencies, and reach shared team understanding.

What is the best way to perform gap analysis on a new feature design?

The best way to perform gap analysis on a feature design is systematic interrogation, walking through every branch of the decision tree to eliminate the risk of executing unvetted plans with hidden gaps.

Why does executing unvetted plans lead to failed projects?

Executing unvetted plans leads to failed projects because hidden gaps, misaligned stakeholder assumptions, and unresolved decision branches cause costly rework and misaligned team output during development.