grill-me

A step-by-step design review resolves decision dependencies by asking one focused question at a time, walking down each branch of the design tree until a shared understanding is reached and providing recommended answers for each step.

A one-question-at-a-time interrogation approach for design critiques relentlessly interviews each plan decision sequentially, imposing a deterministic flow that resolves branching decision dependencies before moving to the next step.

Yes, you can use codebase exploration to inform planning review questions. If a question can be answered by exploring the codebase, the system inspects the codebase to provide context for the next recommended question.

Yes, this approach works for exploring decision trees in software planning by guiding users through branching questions one by one, resolving decision dependencies stepwise to reach a shared understanding of the plan.

The best way to align project plans to a shared understanding is through relentless, stepwise interrogation of each design decision, walking down each branch of the decision tree and providing recommended answers per step.

You should not use a deterministic one-question-at-a-time flow for design reviews when you need open-ended brainstorming or non-linear exploration, as this approach imposes a strict, relentless stepwise flow to resolve decision dependencies.