grill-me

Probe plans branch-by-branch to identify gaps and inconsistencies.

Updated Aug 23, 2026

Search Tags:#planning #interview #design-review #risk-analysis #stakeholder-alignment #decision-tree

Ready to run

npx skills add https://github.com/thethirdorigin/skills --skill grill-me-thethirdorigin

💬 Prompt for ChatGPT / Claude Chat▼

Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: grill-me
Source: https://github.com/thethirdorigin/skills/tree/main/plugins/thethirdorigin-skills/skills/grill-me
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/thethirdorigin/skills --skill grill-me-thethirdorigin

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

This Skill helps teams reach clarity by relentlessly probing a plan or design, uncovering gaps, assumptions, and risks early in the process.

Core Features & Use Cases

Guided interview flow that traverses decision branches and dependencies one by one.
On-demand recommendations: provides the assistant's recommended answers and next steps as you walk through the design.
Progress tracking: tracks resolved decisions and open gaps to ensure nothing is overlooked.

Quick Start

Initiate a design critique by choosing a branch to probe and let the interviewer guide the questioning.

Frequently Asked Questions about grill-me

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema

How do I identify gaps and inconsistencies in a design or architecture plan?▼

To identify plan gaps and inconsistencies, use structured branch-by-branch questioning to traverse dependencies. This guided interview flow probes assumptions, uncovering risks during design reviews or architecture discussions to ensure alignment.

What is the best way to run a design critique that aligns stakeholders?▼

The best way to align stakeholders in a design critique is applying a structured interview flow. This method walks through decision trees one by one, tracking resolved decisions and open gaps to constructively guide alignment.

How do I conduct a risk analysis for UX and engineering plans?▼

Risk analysis for UX and engineering plans is conducted by probing a design branch by branch. This process uncovers assumptions early, providing concrete recommendations, trade-offs, and escalation paths as part of a safe critique.

Can I get on-demand recommendations for next steps during a plan vetting session?▼

Yes, you can get on-demand recommendations during plan vetting. As you walk through a design and answer questions, the assistant provides recommended answers and next steps to resolve open gaps.

How do I track resolved decisions and open gaps during an architecture discussion?▼

Track resolved decisions and open gaps through progress tracking during an architecture discussion. This ensures nothing is overlooked by maintaining a clear record of resolved branches and areas still requiring clarification.

When should I use a structured interview flow for decision tree analysis?▼

Use a structured interview flow for decision tree analysis when vetting plans across product, engineering, and UX contexts. It is needed when you must probe dependencies early to reach clarity and solid decisions.