skills.rest
titaneric
titanericCOMMUNITY
Explore all skills by this author →
WebsiteGitHub

grill-me

Runs a relentless interview session to sharpen a plan or design.

1|Updated May 25, 2020
Search Tags:#interview#plan review#questioning#stress test#design critique#decision validation
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/titaneric/dotfiles --skill grill-me-titaneric
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent▼
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: grill-me
Source: https://github.com/titaneric/dotfiles/tree/main/dot_agents/skills/grill-me
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/titaneric/dotfiles --skill grill-me-titaneric

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve? Plans and designs often contain hidden assumptions, weak reasoning, and unexamined edge cases that only surface under pressure. This Skill subjects your plan or design to a relentless question-and-answer interview so gaps and flaws are exposed before implementation. ## Core Features & Use Cases - Adversarial Interviewing: Challenges your plan or design with persistent, probing questions in a grilling session. - Plan Stress-Testing: Forces you to defend decisions, clarify assumptions, and identify weak points in your reasoning. - Use Case: Before committing to a new system architecture, invoke a grilling session so the AI interrogates your design choices, revealing scalability risks and unstated dependencies you had not considered. ## Quick Start Ask the AI to start a grilling session on your current plan or design document.

Frequently Asked Questions about grill-me

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I stress-test a plan with AI before implementation?▼

Start a grilling session on your plan and answer the AI's probing questions. The interview format forces you to defend assumptions, clarify reasoning, and surface edge cases that silent review typically misses.

What is a grilling session for design review?▼

A grilling session is an adversarial question-and-answer interview where the AI relentlessly challenges your design decisions. It mimics a tough reviewer who keeps asking why until weak points in the design become visible.

Can I use this for documents other than technical designs?▼

Yes, the interview approach works on any plan or design, including project plans, product proposals, and architectural documents. The only requirement is having a concrete plan or design to defend.

When should I not use an adversarial plan review?▼

Avoid it when the plan is still a rough brainstorm with no decisions to defend, since the questioning assumes concrete choices exist. It also does not replace domain-expert review for compliance or safety-critical decisions.

Related Skills

Explore More Product & Management Skills→
uzumaki-incuzumaki-inc

office-hours

Facilitate structured brainstorming sessions and capture decisions in a design doc.

Official
Advanced
AskTinNguyenAskTinNguyen

planning-and-task-breakdown

Break specifications into structured, testable tasks with dependency mapping.

Community
Advanced
dakshrawat298-gifdakshrawat298-gif

security-ask-questions-if-underspecified

Identify missing context in security reviews and generate clarifying questions.

Community
Intermediate
ionfuryionfury
24

architecture-review

Assess architecture proposals against stack fit, cost, and failure modes.

Community
Advanced