grill-me

Name: grill-me
Availability: InStock
Author: tomholford

Interrogate plan assumptions to reveal hidden risks and dependencies.

6|3|Updated Sep 13, 2017

Search Tags:#design #planning #review #assumptions #decision-making #risk-analysis #grill

Ready to run

npx skills add https://github.com/tomholford/dotfiles --skill grill-me-tomholford

💬 Prompt for ChatGPT / Claude Chat▼

Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: grill-me
Source: https://github.com/tomholford/dotfiles/tree/main/claude/skills/grill-me
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/tomholford/dotfiles --skill grill-me-tomholford

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

Facilitates rigorous interrogation of plans and designs to uncover hidden assumptions, dependencies, and risks, helping teams align before moving to implementation.

Core Features & Use Cases

Systematically questions decisions and dependencies to surface gaps.
Walks through branching paths of a design to validate outcomes and constraints.
Use during design reviews, architecture planning, or product-roadmap sessions to ensure thorough validation.

Quick Start

Provide your plan or design draft and ask the AI to grill every decision until the team reaches shared understanding.

Frequently Asked Questions about grill-me

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema

How do I uncover hidden assumptions in a project roadmap?▼

Uncovering hidden assumptions in a project roadmap requires systematically interrogating every decision and dependency to reveal gaps and validate branching outcomes before implementation. This process ensures thorough validation during planning sessions.

What is design review interrogation and how does it work?▼

Design review interrogation rigorously questions design decisions to surface dependencies and constraints by systematically walking through branching paths to validate outcomes and ensure team alignment. This method reveals gaps in architecture planning.

How do I validate branching outcomes during architecture planning?▼

To validate branching outcomes during architecture planning, provide your design draft for rigorous interrogation. The system walks through each path to question decisions and validate constraints until the team reaches shared understanding.

Can I use this to review incomplete or conflicting design decisions?▼

Yes, you can review incomplete or conflicting design decisions. The interrogation process includes specific exception handling to address gaps and resolve conflicting answers during your design or architecture validation sessions.

What is the best way to surface dependencies in a product roadmap?▼

The best way to surface dependencies in a product roadmap is applying rigorous interrogation to every assumption. Systematically questioning decisions reveals hidden risks and gaps, ensuring thorough validation before moving to implementation.