grill-me

To stress-test a product plan, you can use a structured interview process that interrogates every aspect of your design until dependencies are clarified. This forces a detailed back-and-forth to reach a shared, decision-tree-complete understanding.

The best way to conduct a design critique for architecture planning is through branch-by-branch decision-tree resolution. This method walks through the design tree, resolving interdependent choices one-by-one to clarify all architectural dependencies.

Yes, you can use codebase exploration to answer dependency analysis questions during a plan review. When a question can be answered by the codebase, the system prioritizes exploring the codebase over guesswork to ensure accurate dependency mapping.

You can resolve ambiguous requirements by forcing a structured, single-question pacing interview that builds cumulative reasoning. This approach asks questions one at a time to keep reasoning focused until shared understanding is achieved.

You should not use an iterative interview approach for decision making if your plan already has a decision-tree-complete understanding with fully clarified dependencies. It is specifically designed for resolving ambiguous plans and untested assumptions before execution.